Members of this society tend to be explicitly oriented to the political system as a whole, and to political and administrative structures and processes. They tend to be orientated towards an activist role of the self in the policy, through their feelings and evaluations of such a role may vary from acceptance to rejection. 4.5 Commissioners, Panel and Taskforce Members also have a key role in modelling the good behaviour and conduct needed to secure sustainable cultural change. Across the interventions they have successfully used their authority to challenge poor behaviour and worked to create consensus rather than being drawn into conflicts with councillors or officers. Leading by example in this way provides both councillors and officers the opportunity to understand how their council can be more effectively organised and what behaviours are appropriate.
As, individuals increasingly interact with markets, they adopt and internalize these norms, and markets spread more successfully in places where such norms are already in place (Henrich et al., 2010a). Thus, individuals with greater market exposure will be more likely to have adopted or internalized these norms and thus will treat anonymous others more fairly. This hypothesis has been tested, replicated, and extended in two separate projects covering 24 different societies from Siberia to New Guinea. Overall, more market integrated societies tend to split pots of money more evenly with anonymous others, independent of the threat of punishment, income, wealth, education, community size, sex, and age (Henrich et al., 2005, 2010a).
Intervention put in place following an inspection that found evidence of poor governance and widespread fraud and bribery. In Tower Hamlets, Commissioners were repeatedly approached by whistle-blowers who raised concerns of possible fraud and maladministration within the council. Trust in the council’s whistle-blowing policy and officers’ ability to deal with whistle-blowers in a confidential manner had completely broken down.
- This ingroup bias can be expressed as pride in family or country or relative ratings of competence, intelligence, or other positive qualities (Brown, 1986; Evans and Kelley, 2002).
- Conversely, priming individuals with terms related to safety and security make them less likely to favor in-group members .
- Though originally predicting avoidance of and hostile attitudes toward out-groups, the theory has been extended to account for other aspects of parochialism as well, including ingroup favoritism and bias .
Findings from the cross-society studies described earlier are also consistent with this hypothesis (Henrich et al., 2010a), showing that adherents to modern world religions offer more in bargaining experiments. Several theories have been proposed to account for cross-population differences and historical changes in parochialism. First, they vary in the specific mechanisms by which individuals and populations change in response to their environment. Second, they vary in the specific ecological and social conditions which are posited to shape parochialism.
Centaur: Central Archive At The University Of Reading
The independent Grenfell Recovery Taskforce was appointed on 26 July 2017 in the wake of the Grenfell tragedy. Intervention triggered by “serious failings in the council’s corporate governance” and “capacity…to make improvement”. The MHCLG intervention took place alongside a DfE intervention to put in place a Children’s Trust.
This suggests that war-related insecurity vs. drought-related insecurity may produce somewhat different psychological effects (Voors et al., 2012), supporting the notion that these are distinct domains. However, aside from this finding, all of these data are also consistent with the generalized insecurity hypothesis. Many religious traditions emphasize the importance of helping strangers and treating others fairly, and thus enculturation in specific religions may reduce parochialism—either within one’s religion or even across religions. One current theory holds that modern world religions, such as Christianity and Islam, were able to spread precisely because they effectively enculturated norms of prosocial behavior which galvanized large-scale cooperation among relatively anonymous strangers . According to this view, followers of modern world religions, such as Christianity and Islam, will be more likely to have internalized these norms of prosocial behavior and will thus treat anonymous others with greater fairness and generosity.